Меню

The two most famous tools within this methodology are the Root Cause Tree® and the Root Cause Tree® Dictionary. They are designed to be used in tandem to eliminate investigator bias. The Root Cause Tree®

: In the TapRooT® VI Software , the dictionary is built-in as an interactive feature where users can hover over items to see definition notes. Related Professional Guides

The dictionary is split into major branches that help differentiate between technical failures and human performance elements: Human Performance Difficulty (HPD)

Without the dictionary, root cause analysis (RCA) becomes subjective. One investigator might call a mistake a "training issue," while another calls it a "procedure issue." The TapRooT Dictionary provides a "controlled vocabulary."

The Tree narrows your focus until you reach a —a fundamental reason that, if corrected, will prevent recurrence across the entire organization .

: Employees stop feeling blamed for systemic failures. The culture shifts from a "blame culture" to a "just culture."

The dictionary is organized to match the hierarchy of the Root Cause Tree®. The process filters an incident through several layers: 1. Equipment Difficulty vs. Human Performance

The TapRooT® Root Cause Tree® Dictionary is the key to unlocking a truly effective, evidence-based root cause analysis system. By providing expert guidance and a standardized language, it ensures your team uncovers the deep, systemic causes of problems, not just the surface-level symptoms.

: Was critical information passed accurately between teams?

: Was the person properly trained for this specific task?

Procedures: Identifying if a guide was missing, confusing, or simply not followed.

The is a proprietary expert system used to identify root causes of human error and equipment failures through a structured set of yes/no questions.

Words like "procedures," "training," or "communication" can mean different things to different people. The dictionary clearly outlines what constitutes a "procedure deficiency" versus a "training deficiency," removing ambiguity from the report. 3. Guiding the Questioning Process